Comments on: Ardi: Oldest Fossil of Human Ancestor?

By: Intern

Intern — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:07:28 +0000

Nut Job Ethio- your access to keyboard makes you armed and dangerous

By: 100% (Nut Job) ETHIOPIAN TROOPER

100% (Nut Job) ETHIOPIAN TROOPER — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:46:26 +0000

I think the time of Ardie era was better than the time and populations that we have now. (We have too many Monkey-heads – yewushet arada – like me with access to the internet).

By: New Fossil Skeleton From Ethiopia Predates Lucy at Tadias Magazine

New Fossil Skeleton From Ethiopia Predates Lucy at Tadias Magazine — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:08:30 +0000

[...] Related: Ardi: Oldest Fossil of Human Ancestor? [...]

By: Brooks

Brooks — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 01:55:17 +0000

In the movie 2010,Dr Haywood Floyd said: we don’t know what the hell it is, except that it’s very large and it has a purpose. I am wondering since I saw that movie, how the Universe would survive for its intended calibrated purpose to support life, if science is able to push up a bit the force of Gravity or if the relative masses of Protons & Neutrons were changed by a hair. Ummmm

The unending debate will continue!!!!!!!!!–Thanks.

By: Observer

Observer — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:45:49 +0000

As a subscriber to the Vedic description of a Divinely guided process of cosmic manifestation, I’ve witnessed various creation theories that have been developed by materialistic science come and go. There seems to be a need amongst such scientists to develop a version of universal creation that leaves no room or no reason for a Supreme Creator, and thus many materialistic and even atheistic forms of the creation story are presented. The basis of this theory, as explained scientifically, is that we owe the creation of the universe to the breaking away of the absolute symmetry of the absolute emptiness that existed before the creation began. There is a theory called vacuum genesis, which suggests that the universe began from a single particle arising from an absolute vacuum. A particle so powerful that it gave raise to the cosmic creation. Of course, a particle from nothing is admittedly not very likely. But it is a theory that they still work with, possibly for a lack of anything else.

By: Turnpike.net

Turnpike.net — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:05:24 +0000

Two of the biggest weaknesses of evolutionary theory are:

1. There is no adequate explanation for the origin of life from dead chemicals. Even the simplest life form is tremendously complex.

2. The fossil record, our only documentation of whether evolution actually occurred in the past, lacks any transitional forms, and all types appear fully-formed when first present. The evidence that “pre-men” (ape-men) existed is dubious at best. So called pre-man fossils turn out to be those of apes, extinct apes, fully man, or historical frauds.

By: Duba

Duba — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:20:32 +0000

Dagmawi,

I don’t think you have got any clue as to what you’re talking about.

By: Brooks

Brooks — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 01:27:17 +0000

Dagmawi(Respectfully)

I am pious Orthodox Christian believer in the creator God. For me ignoring science & knowledge is sounding like st. Augustine. In my view, God the creator of the Universe can never be/never has been against learning the law of what he created. Thanks.

By: Dagmawi

Dagmawi — Mon, 31 May 2010 03:38:41 +0000

Dagmawi

Who is gonna take this darwinist decption seriously? The evolutionary nonsense is a phylosophy rather than a science. 20th century science has confirmed evolution is a theory in crisis. It was formulated by the an mateur zoologist, Darwin, and propagated by certain anti-religious circles by massive propaganda. It never explains human consciousness, beginning of life, intermediate link, DNA…The theory has been refuted by Quntum physics, thermodynamics, chaos theory….

By: Saba Tekola

Saba Tekola — Sun, 30 May 2010 18:41:43 +0000

This is not good for the science at all. It raises all sorts of questions about the validity of other earlier findings as well. This is a hotly debated academic zone.